Examination report replies
Answer a deceptive, religious, scandalous or prohibited-emblem objection with the mark's actual meaning, its context for the goods or services and any lawful restriction.
Legal references checked:
How to answer a Section 9(2) objection
Section 9(2) is an absolute ground. It covers a mark of such a nature as to deceive the public or cause confusion, matter likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any class or section of the citizens of India, scandalous or obscene matter, and marks whose use is prohibited under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. Answer only the clause actually cited. Explain the mark's meaning in every relevant language and its effect for the specified goods or services. The acquired-distinctiveness proviso applies to Section 9(1), not Section 9(2). Where the problem affects only some goods or services, a lawful restriction of the specification may be the practical answer.
Filing period and procedure
Rule 33(4): respond within one month from receipt of the examination report; if no response is received, the Registrar may treat the application as abandoned. If you restrict the goods or services, apply for the amendment in Form TM-M under Rule 37 with the prescribed fee.
Before you prepare the draft
Facts to confirm
- Exact Section 9(2) clause cited and the examiner's stated reason
- Meaning of every word or device in each relevant language, including slang or secondary meanings
- Transliteration and translation filed for words in other scripts
- Whether the goods/services actually have any characteristic the mark suggests
- Any permission held for a protected name or emblem
Evidence to keep ready
- Mark as filed, specification and examination report
- Dictionary, linguistic or translator material for the meanings relied upon
- Product specifications, certificates or origin records where the mark suggests a quality or origin
- Previous permission of the Central Government or its authorised officer under the Emblems and Names Act, only if it exists
- Draft restricted specification, if an amendment is proposed
Editable draft framework
Replace every [placeholder] and delete optional paragraphs that your facts do not support. You can edit the text below before copying it, or select it and use Ctrl+C or Command+C.
Check before filing
Acquired distinctiveness under the Section 9(1) proviso and an earlier owner's consent under Section 11(4) do not answer a Section 9(2) objection. The Explanation to Section 9 provides that the nature of the goods or services is not itself a ground for refusal, so focus the answer on what the mark conveys. Rule 37 does not permit an amendment that substantially alters the mark or substitutes goods/services not in the application as filed, so removing an objectionable element may need a fresh application. A Rule 30(2) undertaking is included in the advertisement of the application.
Names of living persons, or of persons who died within twenty years before the application date (Section 14), and chemical elements or international non-proprietary names (Section 13) are separate provisions. Other laws, such as the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005, may also restrict particular emblems; check them where relevant.
This is an original drafting framework, not an official statutory form or an assurance of acceptance. Match the notice, application, evidence and service dates; use the prescribed form and complete the applicable filing, service and execution requirements.
Relevant law and official sources
- Trade Marks Act, 1999: Section 9(2)(a) to (d); Explanation to Section 9; Section 22 (correction and amendment)
- Trade Marks Rules, 2017: Rules 28, 30, 33 and 37
- Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950: Sections 3 and 4, where Section 9(2)(d) is cited
Trade Marks Act, 1999 — India Code
Trade Marks Rules, 2017 — IP India