Satyam Infoway v. Siffynet Solutions: SIFY and SIFFYNET domain names
The Supreme Court held in 2004 that a domain name can work like a trademark and be protected by a passing-off action, an...
Read Guide ↗Straightforward answers to the questions brand owners across Gujarat actually ask us — on searching, filing, defending and renewing a trademark.
The Supreme Court held in 2004 that a domain name can work like a trademark and be protected by a passing-off action, an...
Read Guide ↗In a split between brothers over the RAMDEV spice brand, the Supreme Court held that a family settlement could not be re...
Read Guide ↗The Supreme Court allowed Heinz's interim injunction application against Dabur, finding remarkable phonetic similarity b...
Read Guide ↗The Supreme Court upheld an interim injunction stopping a paper company from using 'Mahendra & Mahendra' in its name, gi...
Read Guide ↗A Delhi High Court Division Bench stopped Sadar Laboratories from selling DIL AFZA sharbat, holding its overall impressi...
Read Guide ↗The Supreme Court refused GLUVITA for biscuits because it was too close to GLUCOVITA glucose, and held that rival marks...
Read Guide ↗The Supreme Court refused to remove DROPOVIT on Roche's PROTOVIT complaint, holding that a descriptive suffix common to...
Read Guide ↗The Supreme Court upheld a second, identical DUREX registration on honest concurrent use, holding that genuine commercia...
Read Guide ↗A registration covering a broad class heading can be cut down to the goods the owner actually trades in, so that it cann...
Read Guide ↗That is what we help you decide. Then we search it, file it, defend it, and keep it renewed for the next ten years — from Ahmedabad, for all of Gujarat.